Reality verify: CPAC audio system make false claims in regards to the election, the Capitol assault and The Muppets


Early within the Friday proceedings, CPAC performed a video section that strongly advised there was mass fraud or widespread malfeasance within the 2020 election.

The section was titled “YOUR VOTES CANCELED.” Amongst different issues, it advised there was one thing nefarious about the truth that Joe Biden gained floor late on election night time in vote-counting in swing states — displaying one commentator saying this was “statistically unimaginable,” one other saying it was “very unusual,” and one other, the late radio host Rush Limbaugh, saying the “vote fairy” had visited in a single day.

Details First: That is nonsense, as CNN and lots of others have repeatedly defined since November. Biden gained floor within the vote rely in some states as professional votes had been legitimately counted.
Biden merely did much better than Trump with individuals who voted utilizing mail-in ballots, which some states counted later than they counted in-person ballots. (In Pennsylvania, for instance, this occurred partly as a result of Republican state legislators refused to permit the processing of mail-in votes to start earlier than Election Day as Democrats proposed.) Biden additionally did much better than Trump in most large cities, which had extra ballots to rely than smaller communities.
Biden didn’t achieve floor late at night time in each aggressive state. In Florida, the place counties had been allowed to start out counting mail-in ballots previous to Election Day, Biden jumped out to what ended up being a mirage of a giant lead, however Trump overtook him after in-person votes had been counted. In Arizona, Trump gained floor because the counting proceeded previous Election Day, although he nonetheless ended up dropping.

The legitimacy of the election

TW Shannon, a former Republican state legislator in Oklahoma, mentioned that mobs happen “when folks have a way of hopelessness.” After claiming that Democratic mayors had failed to supply hope to the individuals who ended up burning cities in the summertime of 2020, Shannon then mentioned, “The explanation that folks stormed the Capitol was as a result of they felt hopeless due to a rigged election.”

Details First: The election was not rigged. Joe Biden was the professional winner. There isn’t a proof of widespread fraud or malfeasance.

Shannon would have been right if he had mentioned that lots of the individuals who stormed the Capitol believed the election had been rigged. However that is not what he mentioned.

Fraud and drop bins

Conservative commentator Deroy Murdock mentioned: “Democrats, not Republicans, put in poll drop bins on sidewalks, the place no one oversaw them. What number of fraudulent ballots bought deposited in these bins unchecked after which bought counted? Who is aware of.”

Details First: Murdock’s suggestion that poll drop bins had been insecure is fake; there isn’t any signal that these drop bins had been used fraudulently within the 2020 election. The bins had been secured in varied methods: affixed to the bottom, designed with anti-tampering measures, and, in lots of instances, subjected to 24-hour video surveillance. Additionally, some states and counties run by Republicans made use of poll drop bins.

As well as, states and counties employed varied safety measures to make sure the legitimacy of the ballots that had been deposited within the bins. Even when drop bins are hypothetically tampered with, ballots themselves nonetheless need to cross the standard checks as soon as they arrive at an elections workplace.

Who perpetrated the assault on the Capitol

Speaking in regards to the assault on the Capitol, conservative radio host Wayne Dupree mentioned there have been “lots of people there — Antifa was there, BLM was there, MAGA folks had been there, all people was there. And if Joe Biden needs to speak unity, there was unity there on that day, as a result of America is sick and bored with being pushed down.”

Details First: Dupree was incorrect to recommend the assault on the Capitol was carried out by a united hodgepodge of political activists from left-wing and right-wing actions. In actuality, the rebellion was overwhelmingly perpetrated by supporters of Donald Trump.

We all know this from movies taken on the day of the assault, social media postings by contributors within the assault, and court docket paperwork filed by the FBI afterward. The FBI has mentioned that there’s no indication that Antifa members disguised themselves as Trump supporters that day.
We will not communicate definitively in regards to the political positions of each single one that was concerned within the mob, and the ideology of some alleged contributors may be exhausting to pinpoint. (One in all them, who has a singular political historical past, had beforehand used the hashtags #antifa and #blm on social media, although he has denied truly being a part of the Antifa motion.) However it’s abundantly clear that the overwhelming majority had been Trump supporters.

Church buildings in California

Utah Sen. Mike Lee and Oklahoma Sen. James Lankford criticized California for its coronavirus restrictions.

“The folks of California are recalling their governor as a result of they’ve had sufficient of those stringent closures. They’ve had sufficient of the encroachment upon their rights, and sufficient of the federal government telling them that they’ll take pleasure in a five-star meal at ‘French Laundry’ with their governor however they cannot go to church,” Lee mentioned.

Lankford later echoed Lee’s insinuation of California’s hypocrisy, stating that California is a spot “the place you possibly can go to swanky eating places however to not church.”

Details First: This wants context.

At present, California residents can go to locations of worship which select to open, although indoor capability is restricted. The state did initially ban indoor church companies in counties thought-about at widespread threat of coronavirus transmission however after the US Supreme Court docket dominated partially in favor of the church buildings on February 5, California needed to revise its pointers. In keeping with the newest steerage, locations of worship should restrict indoor attendance to 25% of capability. The state’s Covid-19 web site additionally notes that church capability may be expanded to 50% of constructing capability primarily based on the tier of coronavirus menace the state is experiencing. Singing and chanting is allowed if performers put on masks and keep distance.
Lee and Lankford’s argument for hypocrisy references California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s attendance at an occasion with a dozen folks at Michelin-starred restaurant The French Laundry, for which he was broadly criticized. In keeping with photographs obtained by Fox 11 in Los Angeles, Newsom and the opposite company had been sitting on the restaurant’s outside patio however none of them had been carrying a masks regardless of being in shut proximity.
Newsom apologized for his habits and the choice to dine out on the restaurant when he introduced new coronavirus restrictions later that month, shifting all counties to the strictest tier. Newsom’s habits at The French Laundry would have violated the steerage for face coverings included within the new restrictions. Underneath the new pointers, diners could solely take away their masks if they’re “actively consuming or consuming” and are no less than six toes away from anybody not of their family.

Biden’s feedback on China and the Uyghurs

Robby Starbuck, who’s working for Congress in Tennessee, castigated Biden for feedback he claimed Biden made throughout a CNN city corridor earlier this month.

“They did one thing that I — I by no means thought CNN would do, however they requested him in regards to the Uyghurs in China who’re being raped, tortured, and kids are being kidnapped, compelled to reward China as their mom and to reward communism as their savior. They requested Joe Biden about it, and he mentioned it amounted to a mere cultural distinction,” Starbuck mentioned.

Starbuck added, “I do not assume that extra disgusting phrases have ever left the lips of an American president.”

Details First: Starbuck misleadingly described what Biden mentioned. Biden did check with cultural variations throughout this part of the city corridor, however he didn’t dismiss China’s persecution of the Uyghurs as a “mere cultural distinction.” In truth, he mentioned moments previous to his comment about cultural variations that it’s important for a US president to talk out in opposition to China’s therapy of the Uyghurs and different human rights abuses.

Here is what truly occurred.

When Anderson Cooper requested, “What in regards to the Uyghurs? What in regards to the human rights abuses in China?” Biden responded, “We should communicate up for human rights. It is who we’re.” Biden mentioned he identified to Chinese language President Xi Jinping on their February cellphone name that “no American president may be sustained as a president if he would not mirror the values of the US. And so the thought I am not going to talk out in opposition to what he is doing in Hong Kong, what he is doing with the Uyghurs in western mountains of China …”

Biden quickly continued, “And by the — he mentioned he — he will get it. Culturally, there are totally different norms that every nation and so they — their leaders — are anticipated to observe.”

Biden’s feedback had been a bit muddled. In context, although, he appeared to be saying that Xi understands that, given the totally different cultural norms for every nation’s chief, there’s a cultural norm for an American president to talk out on human rights points. And on condition that Biden had simply mentioned that “we should communicate up for human rights” and communicate out in opposition to “what he is doing with the Uyghurs,” Starbuck’s account of Biden’s response to Cooper overlooked important data.

Deceptive descriptions of Biden’s comment have circulated broadly amongst conservatives on social media.

The Muppets and the left

Mocking the left, Donald Trump Jr. mentioned, “This month alone, they’ve banned The Muppets. After which if there’s belongings you thought had been kind of above cancellation, you’ll be incorrect. There’s nothing the novel left will not cancel.”

Details First: Trump Jr. was incorrect; The Muppets haven’t been banned. In truth, the Disney+ streaming service simply this month began to supply “The Muppet Present,” which initially aired from 1976 to 1981. Trump Jr. may need been referring to the truth that Disney+ added a content material disclaimer in the beginning of 18 episodes and isn’t airing two different episodes — however neither of those strikes may be pretty described as a ban on The Muppets.
The content material warning says that the episodes embrace “unfavourable depictions and/or mistreatment of individuals or cultures,” and “these stereotypes had been incorrect then and are incorrect now,” the Los Angeles Instances reported. The discover goes on to say: “Somewhat than take away this content material, we need to acknowledge its dangerous affect, be taught from it and spark conversations to create a extra inclusive future collectively.”
The Instances reported that “every episode bears the 12-second disclaimer for a distinct motive, from (Johnny) Money’s look singing in entrance of a Accomplice flag to unfavourable depictions of Native People, Center Easterners and folks from different cultures.”
The Instances reported that two episodes from the ultimate season of the present had been left off Disney+ altogether, whereas Leisure Weekly famous that assorted different songs and sketches had been omitted. It isn’t clear that any of those omissions had been associated to culturally delicate content material; Leisure Weekly famous that one of many two episodes starred somebody who was later convicted of possessing baby pornography, whereas different omissions may need been associated to challenges securing music rights.

Voting all over the world

Throughout a panel on defending elections, Republican lawyer Jesse Binnall, who tried to overturn the election ends in Nevada on behalf of the Trump marketing campaign, claimed, “The remainder of the world virtually completely does voting in particular person due to the alternatives for fraud in mail-in voting.”

Details First: Binnall is incorrect in regards to the voting habits of different nations.

Roughly 1/4 of nations use mail-in voting, in keeping with the Pew Analysis Heart. A survey of specialists by the Electoral Integrity Venture, run by researchers at Harvard College and Sydney College, discovered that of the 166 nations for which information was accessible, 40 used postal ballots even earlier than the Covid-19 pandemic.
In keeping with the Electoral Integrity Venture evaluation, postal ballots had been most generally utilized in North America and Europe. Round 1/3 of European nations have some type of mail-in voting, primarily based on an October 2020 report issued by the Worldwide Institute for Democracy and Electoral Help, an intergovernmental group geared toward advancing democracy worldwide.
CNN has additionally repeatedly fact-checked earlier false claims about mail-in voting and fraud. In the US, proof of mail poll fraud is exceedingly uncommon. Whereas there are some vulnerabilities, states have programs and processes in place to forestall forgery, theft and voter fraud.

CNN’s Samara Lipman contributed to this report.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *